PHYSIOTHERAPY APPROACHES IN MANAGING CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN: INTEGRATING MANUAL THERAPY, BIOFEEDBACK, AND PATIENT EDUCATION

Authors

  • Muhammad Arif Gulab Devi Educational Complex, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Iqbal Tehsil Headquarter Hospital Muridkey, Muridkey, Pakistan
  • Saima Bibi Gulab Devi Educational Complex, Lahore, Pakistan

Keywords:

Pelvic Pain Chronic, Physiotherapy and Manual Therapy, Biofeedback, Patient Education, Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Pain Management.

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) occurs in 15 to 25 percent of all women and 8 to 12 percent of men around the world and has created a tremendous impact on physical, psychological, and economic statuses, costing annual healthcare attention in the United States, which is estimated to be 2.4 billion dollars. The physiotherapy management of CPP may consist of physiotherapy, such as massage therapy, biofeedback, and patient education, providing non-invasive, evidence-based treatment to the musculoskeletal, neurological, and psychosocial aspects of CPP. This systematic review is based on  peer-reviewed articles (2018-2025) (PRISMA) that aim at examining the effectiveness, processes, and limitations in the implementation of such strategies. In manual therapy, the pain is lowered by 20-40 per cent and the pelvic floor is improved. In biofeedback, muscle control improves with a 25-30 per cent improvement in pain reduction, patient education encourages self-management, and quality of life improves 20-35 per cent. Integrated programs show 50 percent pain reduction but are barricaded by issues like overpricing ($500 to $5000), location inability in rural areas, and the variability of protocols. The presented review is a valuable guideline to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers that promotes the idea of standard procedures, a multidisciplinary approach, the validation of telehealth, and culturally competent education as a way to utilize CPP management to its fullest potential and minimize the worldwide burden of this condition.

References

Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician. 2014;17(2):141–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2014/17/E141

Hutton D, Mustafa A, Patil S, Rathod S, Shrikhande G, Advincula A, et al. The burden of Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP): Costs and quality of life of women and men with CPP treated in outpatient referral centers. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0269828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269828

Hutton D, Mustafa A, Patil S, Rathod S, Shrikhande G, et al. The burden of Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP): Costs and quality of life of women and men with CPP treated in outpatient referral centers. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0269828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269828

Engeler DA, Bananowski AP, Berghmans B, Borovicka J, Cottrell AM, Elneil S, et al. EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. 2019. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10085000/1/24%20Chronic%20Pelvic%20Pain_2019%20final.pdf

Johnson S, Bradshaw A, Bresnahan R, Evans E, Herron K, Hapangama D. Biopsychosocial Approaches for the Management of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. BJOG. 2024;132:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.18096

Vural M. Pelvic pain rehabilitation. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;64(4):291–299. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2018.3616

Bø K, Anglès-Acedo S, Batra A, et al. International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 3 Committee 2; conservative treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse: Pelvic floor muscle training. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:2633–2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05324-0

Physiopedia. Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE). 2025. https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=Pain_Neuroscience_Education_(PNE)&oldid=370000

Frawley H, Neumann P, Delany C. An argument for competency-based training in pelvic floor physiotherapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;35:1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1470706

Jeong SM. Primary Care Physicians' Important Role: Lifestyle Modification for Chronic Disease Management. Korean J Fam Med. 2024;45(5):237–238. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.45.5E

Fordham B, Sugavanam T, Edwards K, Hemming K, Howick J, Copsey B, et al. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25(9):1–378. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25090

Lee J, Kim J. Method of App Selection for Healthcare Providers Based on Consumer Needs. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2018;36(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000399

Spångeus A, Willerton C, Enthoven P, Grahn Kronhed AC. Patient Education Improves Pain and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Established Spinal Osteoporosis in Primary Care Pilot Study of Short- and Long-Term Effects. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064933

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Di Spiezio Sardo A, Becker CM, Renner SP, Suvitie PA, Tarriel JE, Vannuccini S, et al. Management of women with endometriosis in the 21st century. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2025;37(3):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001027

Worthington H, Wang E, Bayraktar D, Therrien S, Primeau C, Whittaker J, et al. Barriers and Facilitators of Access to Physical Therapy: A Scoping Review. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024;76(suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-and-facilitators-of-access-to-physical-therapy-a-scoping-review/

Gentles A, Goodwin E, Bedaiwy Y, Marshall N, Yong PJ. Nociplastic Pain in Endometriosis: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(24):7521. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247521

Anderson RU, Wise D. Trigger point therapy for chronic prostatitis: a randomized trial. Urology. 2021;151:89–95. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/548d/a532db8b44055dccb7ddcde6a5cb1d554e24.pdf

Son JH, Park GD, Park HS. The effect of sacroiliac joint mobilization on pelvic deformation and the static balance ability of female university students with si joint dysfunction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(6):845–848. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.845

de Morton N. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55:129–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70043-1

Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies in Meta-Analysis. 2000. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261773681

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

da Silva FC, Vieira LS, Santos LV, Gaudreault N, Cruvinel-Júnior RH, Santos GM. Effectiveness of visceral fascial therapy targeting visceral dysfunctions outcome: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04099-1

Clarke CE, Patel S, Ives N, Rick CE, Dowling F, Woolley R, et al. Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy vs No Therapy in Mild to Moderate Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(3):291–299. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4452

Ezzatvar Y, Dueñas L, Balasch-Bernat M, Lluch-Girbés E, Rossettini G. Response to Comment on "Which Portion of Physiotherapy Treatments' Effect Is Not Attributable to the Specific Effects in People With Musculoskeletal Pain? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials" by Ezzatvar et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024;54(12):784–785. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.0201-R

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Review Articles